Crypto news

16.06.2026
14:41

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has equated the digital ruble and cryptocurrency to property: a new era of protection

The Russian judicial system has taken a fundamental step in recognizing digital assets. In an updated resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court, dedicated to cases of theft, robbery, and assault, it is officially established that the digital ruble, digital currency (cryptocurrency), and digital rights are now fully recognized as objects of theft. The document was adopted under the leadership of Supreme Court Chairman Igor Krasnov.

For the entire domestic crypto industry, this clarification is of immense significance. It legally establishes that any digital assets are now subject to criminal law protection on par with material forms of property. This is not just a formality, but a fundamental change in the legal landscape that closes many legal gaps that previously existed.

What exactly is now considered an object of crime?

The highest judicial authority has detailed the list of valuables that can be unlawfully taken. The updated list includes:

  • physical items;
  • cash funds;
  • documentary securities;
  • other movable and immovable property.

To the latter category, the court directly includes non-cash funds, including digital rubles, non-documentary securities, digital rights, and digital currency. Thus, the digital ruble, the third form of national currency from the Bank of Russia, is now unequivocally considered a legitimate object for qualifying theft. A similar legal approach now applies to cryptocurrency and any digital rights.

Moment of the crime

Separately, in its resolution, the Supreme Court clarified the exact timing. A criminal offense is considered completed directly from the moment assets are debited from the victim's account. The logic here is simple: it is at that point that the perpetrator gains a real opportunity to dispose of the stolen property.

Furthermore, the highest judicial body described in detail the legal situation with multiple consecutive debits. For example, if a single victim's savings are withdrawn in parts, in several transactions, but all the perpetrator's actions are united by a single intent, the act is qualified as one continuing crime, rather than a series of separate criminal episodes. This is an important nuance that simplifies investigation and prosecution.

According to judicial statistics, more than 26,000 people are annually convicted in Russia for theft from bank accounts or regarding electronic funds. Now this practice has received a clear legal basis for application to digital assets as well.

Cryptalist Analysis: This decision is not just a technical clarification. It creates a precedent that will likely accelerate the legalization of the cryptocurrency market in Russia. We see how the state, on one hand, introduces regulation, and on the other, recognizes digital assets as a full-fledged object of law. This reduces risks for investors and opens the door for a more civilized circulation of digital currencies in the country. However, the question of practical implementation remains: how exactly will the fact of cryptocurrency ownership and its debiting be proven under conditions of blockchain anonymity? Answers to these questions will likely emerge in the near future through law enforcement practice.