Crypto news

16.06.2026
22:21

The DeFi leverage ratio has soared to 2021 highs amid a security crisis.

The decentralized finance sector is experiencing a paradoxical situation: the leverage ratio has surged sharply, returning to historical levels seen in 2021. At first glance, this might appear to be a sign of active growth and high market activity, but the reality is far more alarming.

My analysis shows that the current dynamics are driven not by an increase in demand for borrowed funds, but by a rapid decline in the total value locked (TVL). The ratio, reflecting the proportion of borrowed capital and margin positions to collateral, has soared to 38%.

The root of the problem lies in a series of large-scale hacker attacks that hit DeFi this spring. Attackers caused colossal damage, siphoning billions of dollars from various protocols. Two major platforms suffered the most: the Kelp DAO protocol lost approximately $292 million due to a critical vulnerability, and the Drift Protocol project also faced a devastating exploit.

These incidents triggered panic among investors. Fearing for the safety of their funds, they began to withdraw capital en masse. The total value of collateral dropped sharply across many blockchain networks. DeFi exploits in April triggered an outflow of TVL of approximately $13 billion.

It is important to understand the mechanics: traders did not start taking out more loans. Rather, the overall base of assets serving as collateral significantly shrank. It is this change in proportions that caused the abnormal increase in the ratio.

Even after the local stabilization of the market, the volume of margin positions has not decreased. This means the ecosystem retains heightened sensitivity to potential liquidations. Any further decline in cryptocurrency prices could trigger a chain reaction of forced position closures.

My expert assessment: The situation remains extremely unstable. The sector has still not fully recovered from the spring security crisis. The current high level of leverage is not a sign of market health, but a symptom of accumulated systemic risks that could materialize at the slightest negative price movement.