Crypto news

19.06.2026
08:36

The Fate of Giants: How MiCA is Reshaping the Map of the European Crypto Industry

Starting July 1, 2026, the transitional period provided for by the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation expires for cryptocurrency platforms in 27 European Union countries. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has ruled out any possibility of delays: companies that have not obtained a license must immediately cease servicing clients from the EU. This is not just a bureaucratic milestone, but a tectonic shift that is already reshaping the market structure.

The World's First Macro-Regulator: What Has Changed

MiCA is the first comprehensive set of rules for the crypto market at the level of an entire macro-region in history. Key provisions include a clear division of crypto assets into electronic money tokens (EMTs, i.e., fiat stablecoins), asset-referenced tokens (ARTs), and utility tokens. Crypto asset service providers (CASPs) — exchanges, wallets, exchangers — are required to obtain a single license, which, thanks to the "regulatory passport" system, automatically grants access to the markets of all 27 bloc countries. Issuers must publish detailed white papers, and strict requirements have been introduced for stablecoins: regular audits, liquid reserves, storage of 60% of collateral in European banks, and coverage of at least 3% of reserves with own capital.

Who Has Been Left Behind: 80% of the Market Without Licenses

The MiCA requirements have proven insurmountable for most players. According to ESMA data as of mid-2026, about 210 companies have received official CASP authorization. For comparison: before the regulation was adopted, over 1,200 officially registered services operated in Europe, with the total number of firms reaching up to 3,000. Thus, approximately 80% of platforms have been left without licenses. After July 1, these companies will not only lose retail clients but will also face institutional isolation: they will have no access to European regulated capital, banking partners, or large funds.

Even industry giants are experiencing difficulties. Binance, the world's largest crypto exchange, has not yet received MiCA authorization. The Greek regulator recognized their application as compliant with the norms, but the process has stalled at the ESMA review level. HTX and BitMEX are in limbo, while Coinbase, Kraken, Crypto.com, Bybit, Gemini, and OKX have already ensured their compliance with the norms.

The Fate of USDT: The Leader's Departure and a Banking Dead End

Particular attention is focused on the stablecoin sector. The undisputed market leader — USDT from Tether, with a market capitalization of over $180 billion — has not received approval from European regulators. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated that MiCA's requirement to hold 60% of reserves in European bank deposits is fundamentally incompatible with the company's business model, so they did not even submit an application. As a result, major exchanges, including Coinbase, Kraken, Crypto.com, and Binance, have gradually removed USDT pairs from their European platforms.

It is important to understand: MiCA does not impose a direct ban on holding or transferring USDT. ESMA has clarified that this is not considered a "public offer" or "admission to trading." However, trading platforms are obliged to strictly limit services that facilitate the purchase of such assets. As a compromise, a temporary "sell-only and withdrawal" regime is allowed so that investors can close their positions. But, as noted by the technical committee of the MiCA Crypto Alliance, the absence of a direct ban does not make USDT legal for free commercial use within the EU.

Market Impact: Liquidity Fragmentation and Rising Costs

The disappearance of USDT from European spot markets is a serious blow to liquidity. USDT has historically been the main provider of liquidity and the base trading pair for most assets. The forced delisting will affect professional participants: market makers will have to split liquidity pools, cross-exchange arbitrage will become more complicated, and the transition to new pairs (USDC, EURC) will lead to wider spreads and increased slippage. Trading large volumes in Europe will temporarily become more expensive until regulated analogues build up comparable mass.

However, as experts rightly note, the EU is not the largest market for USDT. Institutions are already gradually moving to USDC, and the market is adapting quickly. USDT will remain the dominant dollar stablecoin globally, especially outside Europe. Some liquidity will move to offshore platforms and non-custodial wallets, but the shift to DeFi will be limited due to technical complexity for the mass user.

The Institutional Paradox and Tether's Plan B

Interestingly, other major projects also fall under regulation: USDe from Ethena Labs, PYUSD from PayPal, and RLUSD from Ripple. Ripple, for example, did not manage to obtain a license in the EU, despite opening a subsidiary in Luxembourg. PayPal also faced the need for complex restructuring. As a result, the only stablecoins from the top 10 fully compliant with the regulation are USDC and EURC from Circle.

Tether, for its part, is not abandoning the European market, having chosen a white-label solutions strategy. StablR and Oobit, supported by the company, have already introduced MiCA-compliant stablecoins: the euro-pegged EURR and the dollar-pegged USDR. A new tokenization platform, Hadron from Tether, is used for their issuance. This is a smart move: Tether maintains its presence in the region without sacrificing its business model.

My Analysis

MiCA is not a catastrophe for the market, but its evolution. Yes, liquidity fragmentation and increased operational costs are inevitable in the short term. But in the long term, we will see market consolidation around a few key, fully regulated players. Interestingly, the traditional EU financial sector is already preparing its own alternative: a consortium of 37 largest banks is developing a single euro stablecoin, Qivalis, designed to reduce the region's dependence on dollar digital infrastructure. This is a signal: the future belongs to regulated but competitive stablecoins, and the battle for the European user is just beginning.