A $100 million prison startup, Tether's revolt against the EU, and a ban on the digital dollar: a week of tectonic shifts in the crypto industry

This week, the crypto world found itself at the epicenter of several fateful events: from the ambitious plans of the convicted FTX founder to Tether's strategic maneuver to bypass European regulations. We are also witnessing the decline of the meme-coin era, traditional exchanges' legal battles for monopoly, and a global crackdown on privacy. Let's analyze each case from a market analyst's perspective.
Sam Bankman-Fried's Ambitions: A Prison Startup and the Illusion of Forgiveness
Sam Bankman-Fried, serving a 25-year sentence for the largest fraud in cryptocurrency history, is already making plans for life after release. According to information from his cellmate, SBF estimates the necessary starting capital for "making serious money" at $50–100 million and hints at a new crypto project that "everyone will flock to." Simultaneously, he has appealed to Donald Trump for a presidential pardon, and his parents have hired lobbyists.
Against this backdrop, the community has once again recalled FTX's venture investments, which bankruptcy administrators liquidated for a fraction of their current value (stakes in SpaceX, Anthropic, and Solana are valued at $114 billion). However, most experts agree: even if SBF is a genius investor, his crime (illegal use of client funds) negates any prospects of restoring trust. The market does not forgive such mistakes.
Tether's Strategy in Europe: Bypassing MiCA Without Direct Compliance
The European authority ESMA has demanded that by July 1, all crypto platforms obtain a license under the MiCA regulation, or face a complete withdrawal from the EU. Tether deliberately refused the license, deeming the requirement to hold 60% of reserves in European banks a threat to financial stability. Instead, the company chose a workaround: investing in partners who already have legal status, through which fully legitimate stablecoins will be issued.
This move preserves Tether's presence in the EU market without direct subordination to local officials. However, the consequences for the market will be severe: forced delisting of USDT in Europe will hit market makers, complicate cross-exchange arbitrage, and widen spreads. Essentially, Tether demonstrates that global players can ignore regional rules if they have the resources and partners.
Ban on the Digital Dollar in the US: A Victory for Stablecoins
The US is moving toward a legislative ban on issuing a digital dollar (CBDC) at least until 2030. The provision prohibiting the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC is embedded in the affordable housing bill—this packaging allowed it to overcome the resistance that had stalled a separate anti-CBDC document. American lawmakers fear total surveillance of transactions, control over spending (as in the digital yuan), and the displacement of commercial banks.
An important nuance: private stablecoins are exempt from the ban. This means the world's largest economy is officially exiting the global CBDC race, recognizing stablecoins as an alternative the state is willing to tolerate. For the market, this is a signal: US regulators are betting on private digital currencies, not state-issued ones.
Collapse of Meme Coins: Bubble Bursts, Capital Returns to TradFi
Revenue on the Pump.fun platform has plummeted by over 70%. The platform allowed anyone to issue their own token for a few dollars, leading to an explosive increase in the number of new coins, but nearly 96% of traders either lost money or earned no more than $500. To prevent a price drop, developers announced the burning of tokens worth $370 million (36% of the supply).
The situation reflects a large-scale process of capital redistribution: investors are locking in losses, withdrawing liquidity from unregulated instruments that major players view as gambling, and returning funds to TradFi. The practice of buying assets without fundamental value has stopped working. Traders must return to basic rules and seek digital assets with real-world applications, making the market safer but less speculative.
CME Group Defends Its Monopoly: Lawsuit Against CFTC
The operator of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, CME Group, will sue the regulator CFTC over its permission for the Kalshi platform to launch perpetual futures. CME CEO Terrence Duffy formally appeals to investor protection (comparing high leverage to the 2008 mortgage crisis) and the Dodd-Frank Act. However, the real reason is protecting the monopoly: CME holds exclusive licenses for all major benchmarks on which futures contracts are based.
Duffy's logic is simple: if we control the benchmarks, then new instruments on these indices must trade with us. A similar pattern is observed with ICE, demanding "equal rules" due to the rise of the Hyperliquid platform. This is a classic example of how traditional exchanges try to stifle innovation through the courts.
Destruction of Communication Privacy: A Global Trend Toward Total Control
The UK government is preparing a law banning the use of social media (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube) for citizens under 16, while in France and the EU, an initiative is advancing to mass-scan personal messages on smartphones before they are sent. Under the pretext of fighting terrorism and protecting children, governments are forcing citizens to give up the basic right to privacy.
As Pavel Durov rightly noted, a forced abandonment of end-to-end encryption (embedding backdoors) will not stop real criminals, who can easily write their own private applications. Ordinary law-abiding citizens will be the ones affected. Moreover, weakening encryption systems makes corporate networks of banks and funds vulnerable to hacker attacks. To preserve privacy, users will have to switch to decentralized services—and this is perhaps the only positive signal for the crypto industry.
My conclusion: this week showed that the crypto market is entering a phase of maturity. Meme coins are dying, stablecoins are winning the battle against CBDCs, and regulators are increasingly trying to control privacy. Investors should prepare for stricter regulation, but also for growing interest in decentralized solutions.