A $100 million prison startup and a revolt against the EU: how SBF and Tether broke the system

This week, the focus of my analysis is on Sam Bankman-Fried's ambitious plans, Tether's strategy to circumvent MiCA rules, and the ban on the digital dollar in the U.S. I will also examine the burst meme coin bubble, traditional exchanges' legal battles for monopoly, and the global trend of states destroying communication privacy.
Sam Bankman-Fried's Ambitions
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, serving a 25-year sentence for one of the largest financial frauds, is building ambitious plans for life after release. He confessed to his cellmate that to "make serious money," he would need $50 million to $100 million in startup capital, and mentioned a cryptocurrency project that "everyone will flock to." Simultaneously, he appealed to Donald Trump for a presidential pardon, and his parents hired lobbyists.
The community again recalled FTX's venture investments (stakes in SpaceX, Anthropic, Solana worth a total of $114 billion), which bankruptcy administrators sold for a fraction of that amount. Still, most commentators agree: although SBF may be a genius investor, he committed completely unacceptable acts by illegally using client funds. Therefore, even if he wasn't joking about the future crypto project, it's hard to imagine him regaining trust.
Tether's Strategy in Europe
The European authority ESMA announced that by July 1, all crypto platforms must obtain a license under the new MiCA regulation, or they must completely cease servicing EU clients. Tether's management deliberately refused to obtain a license, deeming the requirement to hold 60% of reserves in European banks risky for financial stability. However, the company chose a strategy to bypass direct restrictions and is now investing in partners who already have legal status. Fully legitimate stablecoins will be issued through them, thus Tether will indirectly maintain its presence in the EU market without direct subordination to local officials.
Meanwhile, the forced delisting of USDT in Europe will hit professional market participants: market makers will have to split liquidity pools, inter-exchange arbitrage will become more complicated, and spreads will widen.
Ban on the Digital Dollar in the U.S.
The U.S. is moving toward a legislative ban on the digital dollar at least until the end of 2030. The provision prohibiting the Fed from issuing a CBDC is embedded in an affordable housing bill—this packaging allowed overcoming resistance that had stalled a separate anti-CBDC document. American lawmakers fear specific things: total real-time surveillance of every transaction, control over spending (programming money with the ability to freeze without court order, as in the digital yuan), and the displacement of commercial banks.
Private stablecoins are clearly exempt from the ban. For the global CBDC race, this means the world's largest economy is officially exiting it, and stablecoins are designated as an alternative the state is willing to tolerate.
Consequences of the Meme Coin Hype
Revenues of the Pump.fun platform have plummeted by over 70%. The platform allowed anyone to issue their own token for a few dollars, leading to an explosive increase in the number of new coins, but ultimately nearly 96% of all traders either lost money or earned no more than $500. To prevent a price drop, developers announced the burning of tokens worth about $370 million (36% of supply).
The situation reflects a large-scale capital redistribution process: investors are massively booking losses, withdrawing liquidity from unregulated instruments that major players view as gambling, and returning funds to TradFi. The practice of buying assets without fundamental value has stopped working; traders must return to basic rules and seek digital assets with real practical application, making the market safer.
CME Group Defends Its Monopoly
Chicago Mercantile Exchange operator CME Group will sue regulator CFTC over allowing the Kalshi platform to launch perpetual futures. CME head Terrence Duffy formally appeals to investor protection (comparing high leverage to the 2008 mortgage crisis) and the Dodd-Frank Act. Meanwhile, CME holds exclusive licenses for all major benchmarks on which futures contracts are built. Duffy combined investor concern and monopoly protection in the lawsuit. The logic goes roughly like this: we control the benchmarks, so new instruments on these indices must be traded with us. A similar pattern is observed with ICE, demanding "equal rules" due to the growth of the Hyperliquid platform.
Destruction of Communication Privacy
The UK government is preparing a law that will completely ban the use of social networks (Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube) for citizens under 16, while in France and the EU, an initiative is advancing for mass scanning of personal messages on smartphones before sending. A global trend is emerging: under the pretext of fighting terrorism or protecting children, governments are forcing citizens to give up the basic right to privacy. As Pavel Durov noted, the forced abandonment of end-to-end encryption technology (embedding backdoors) will not stop real criminals, as they can easily write their own private applications. Ultimately, ordinary law-abiding citizens will be affected.
Furthermore, weakening encryption systems makes corporate networks of banks and funds vulnerable to hacker attacks and data theft, and users will have to switch to decentralized services to maintain privacy.
My opinion: these events show that the crypto industry is entering a phase of maturity, where regulatory games and market manipulations are replaced by more meaningful strategies. However, the risk of centralization and loss of privacy remains a key challenge for decentralized technologies.