Crypto news

This week, the energy market experienced a major shock, with the Brent benchmark posting its deepest weekly drop in months, plunging 9%. However, Bitcoin's reaction to this event was surprisingly restrained, falling only 1%. This price divergence forces us to question the established view of a strong link between the oil market and the digital asset.

Many market participants are accustomed to viewing a drop in energy prices as a "green light" for a subsequent rebound in the cryptocurrency market. But the real intrigue lies not in the dynamics of oil prices, but in deeper factors: inflation indicators, exchange position distribution, and the behavior of miners themselves. Let's break down why Bitcoin remains indifferent to oil price swings.

The Myth of an Oil Bottom for Bitcoin

After the US and Iran reached an agreement to resume operations in the Strait of Hormuz, Brent fell below the $80 per barrel mark, while the US benchmark WTI settled around $70. A common belief among traders is that after a sharp decline in oil, Bitcoin often forms a global bottom. Some expect a new rise in oil prices in the second half of the year due to a possible escalation between Iran and Israel, as well as the introduction of fees for passage through the Strait of Hormuz. According to their calculations, it is this oil rebound that could trigger another wave of Bitcoin sell-offs and form the year's low.

However, if we look closely at the data over the past five years, it becomes obvious: there is no significant dependency here.

Five-Year Data: Correlation is Illusory

The mathematical correlation between Bitcoin and oil over the past five years has been only 0.036. As a reminder, this coefficient is measured from +1 (complete alignment of trajectories) to -1 (strictly opposite movement). The current level of 0.036 clearly demonstrates a complete absence of a stable relationship between these assets.

Even when broken down in detail into different market phases — a calm period, high volatility, and the last 30 days — both indicators remain extremely close to zero. This leads to an unambiguous conclusion: there is no serious investment relationship between the assets under any conditions.

Moreover, the very chain of macroeconomic influence from energy to digital assets is largely broken. Fuel costs do indeed affect inflation expectations (with a significant coefficient of 0.41), but this impulse almost completely fades and does not reach the real yield of US government bonds. And since bond yields themselves have a weak influence on cryptocurrency, the final signal is ultimately lost along this long path.

Miners and Long-Term Investors Are Not Panicking

Historical examples confirm this thesis. When Brent rapidly rose to its local peak around $119 at the end of March, the price of the leading cryptocurrency did not fall but demonstrated enviable stability. During this same period, long-term investors holding coins in wallets for more than 155 days were steadily increasing their positions. Their net purchase balance remained consistently positive until the beginning of June, marking an important reversal after major sell-offs in the second half of 2025.

The only direct economic link between these industries lies in the mining sector. Electricity is the primary resource for cryptocurrency mining, so abnormally high energy costs can reduce business margins. However, the network's total hashrate, reflecting the overall computing power of equipment, has been confidently increasing recently, and this is happening despite the fall in the WTI price. This growth in power against the backdrop of cheaper resources indicates miners' fundamental belief in the industry's long-term prospects.

Since large investors and miners are demonstrating high resilience, the source of current pressure must be sought elsewhere. The main catalyst is the derivatives market.

Where is the Pressure on Bitcoin Coming From?

Key warning signals are now clearly visible in the derivatives sector. Bitcoin's open interest indicator, reflecting the total value of active futures contracts, has increased from $21.83 billion to $23.45 billion since June 11. Simultaneously, the funding rate has sharply changed, moving from a positive zone around +0.0023% into negative territory around -0.002%.

A negative funding rate means that sellers are forced to pay buyers to hold their positions. This dynamic vividly reflects the predominance of bearish sentiment. The increase in the number of open contracts along with the drop in the rate indicates that speculators are actively opening short positions, rather than rushing to buy the current dip.

This situation contains important market logic. If cheaper commodities were indeed a powerful driver for cryptocurrency growth, exchange players would be massively opening long positions. However, in practice, short bets currently dominate. This prevailing picture creates ideal conditions for a short squeeze. In such a scenario, any random upward impulse will force bears to panic-close their positions and buy back coins, leading to an avalanche-like rise in quotes.

And here lies the main mental trap for investors. If a short squeeze does occur, many commentators will rush to explain the price surge by the drop in oil prices. Although, in reality, the upward movement will be triggered solely by the technical closing of margin positions, and not by commodity factors. At the same time, the overall backdrop will remain negative, causing the impulse to be short-lived.

As of today, Bitcoin's connection to the oil market is too weak to exert a real influence on quotes. While Brent trades around $79 per barrel, Bitcoin holds the $62,800 level. It is clear that the next powerful price impulse for cryptocurrency will be dictated not by the cost of a barrel, but by the decisions of the US Federal Reserve and conditions in the derivatives market.

Expert Opinion: The market has finally proven its maturity by decoupling from commodity cycles. Investors waiting for an "oil bottom" to enter Bitcoin should shift their focus to the Fed's monetary policy and the dynamics of open interest in the futures market — these factors are currently the true drivers of price.