Crypto news

The digital asset market presents a paradoxical picture: stablecoins pegged to the Turkish lira have surpassed euro-denominated tokens in transaction volume. According to data from Standard Chartered's subsidiary, Zodia Markets, the volume of on-chain transfers in lira reached $3.4 billion in 2025. This makes the Turkish currency the second most popular in the "stablecoin" segment after the dollar. Where does the euro stand in this hierarchy?

The gap between dollar and euro stablecoins is colossal — a 200-fold difference. And this gap is not shrinking but widening. Let's figure out why the European Union lost the blockchain race before it truly began, and whether it has a chance to rectify the situation.

Disappointing Statistics

The global stablecoin market reached an all-time high in 2026, with a total market capitalization exceeding $316 billion, roughly 10% higher than January levels. Dollar-pegged "stablecoins" dominate: Tether (USDT) has a market valuation of over $185 billion, and Circle (USDC) around $75 billion. The share of euro stablecoins is so small it can be disregarded — just $912 million, or less than 0.3% of the dollar stablecoin market.

Leading players in the euro segment: EURC from Circle — $430 million, EURCV from Societe Generale — $130 million, EURI from Banking Circle S.A. — $55 million. Even the largest euro-based token, EURC, ranks only 12th among all "stablecoins" and 86th in the overall digital asset ranking. Trading volumes are equally telling: the daily turnover of euro stablecoins is around $100 million, while dollar-denominated assets process over $70 billion.

Analysts at TRM Labs recorded a surge in euro token activity in the first quarter of 2026 following the enforcement of MiCA regulations in the European Union — in March, trading turnover exceeded $700 million. However, these figures, which are still difficult to compare with dollar stablecoin metrics, subsequently declined. Moreover, the euro has lost ground not only to the dollar but also to the Turkish lira.

Despite MiCA: Regulation as a Brake

It would seem that the EU's regulatory framework for the crypto market, MiCA, should have given euro stablecoins a competitive advantage. Clear rules, consumer protection, clarity for issuers. However, the document has become the main hindrance to the development of European tokens. The core issue lies in the reserve requirements. Under MiCAR, issuers are obligated to hold at least 30% of reserves as deposits with local banks, and major players up to 60%.

Such regulatory frameworks create more burdensome conditions for companies than the US GENIUS Act. US authorities allow for state-level rules for issuers, expanding the "range of jurisdictions" to meet different market participant needs. EU regulators, on the other hand, reject any attempts to ease the norms. In the spring, the Brussels-based economic research center Bruegel proposed lowering the liquidity requirement to support the local stablecoin market, but the European Central Bank (ECB) rejected the initiative.

ECB President Christine Lagarde cited risks to the stability of the banking system, specifically due to threats to traditional lending and the difficulty of controlling interest rates. Instead of supporting stablecoins, the ECB is betting on tokenized bank deposits. The price of European caution is a strategic lag. As ECB board member Isabel Schnabel stated, almost all stablecoins are denominated in dollars, and their growth could strengthen the dominance of the US currency and undermine the euro's role in tokenized finance.

Market and Structural Obstacles

Regulation is not the only reason for the lag of euro stablecoins. Economic, regional, and many other factors work against them. The network effect of the dollar plays a role. Crypto infrastructure has been built around the US currency from the very beginning. Almost all modern blockchain platforms are oriented towards USD pairs. The digital asset market has fallen into a recursive loop: dollar stablecoins have high liquidity, attracting more users who further increase liquidity. In turn, euro tokens offer a limited number of trading pairs and minimal arbitrage opportunities on a global scale.

Another important factor is the low demand for euro-denominated tokens — both from retail clients and banks. The success of the Turkish lira in stablecoin format can be explained by the weak banking system, including slow and expensive transfers. In Europe, there is no such "pain point." EU financial institutions provide cheap, round-the-clock instant payments. Payment systems like TARGET2 and TIPS already efficiently process euro transactions, reducing the need for a decentralized alternative. Two-thirds of European banks cited insufficient demand for stablecoins.

Pressure on major players adds to the EU's problems. According to ESMA rules, from July 1, crypto companies without a MiCA license must cease servicing clients in the European Union. By May, only 194 companies had received official permission — a small fraction of the 3,000 firms previously operating in the region. The departure of the crypto market leader, Tether, will likely be the most severe test for the Eurozone. Back in 2024, the company stopped issuing the euro stablecoin EURT. By spring 2026, the issuer had still not received regulatory approval. According to Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino, the requirement to hold 60% of reserves in European bank deposits is fundamentally incompatible with the company's business model. European divisions of major centralized exchanges like Binance, Bybit, and OKX have already removed trading pairs with USDT.

My analysis: The prospects for euro stablecoins look bleak. Developing the segment when there is no demand from banks and retail, and regulators create obstacles, is practically impossible. For issuers, this is an obvious "red flag." Tokenization and CBDCs should provide a boost for the development of the European Union's digital economy, but their full implementation will take several years. By that time, dollar-denominated assets will have further strengthened their positions, and the euro risks finally losing its chance to compete in the blockchain space.