Crypto news

The stablecoin market is delivering a surprise that should alarm European regulators: tokens pegged to the Turkish lira have surpassed euro stablecoins in on-chain transaction volume. In 2025, the volume of lira transfers reached $3.4 billion, placing the Turkish currency second only to the dollar in this segment. Where does the euro stand in this hierarchy? The answer is disappointing.

The gap between dollar and euro stablecoins is not just a percentage difference but a 200-fold one. And this chasm is not shrinking—it is only deepening. Let's explore why the European Union lost the blockchain race before it even truly began, and whether there is any chance to turn things around.

Numbers That Don't Lie

The global stablecoin market hit an all-time high in 2026, exceeding $316 billion in total market capitalization—roughly 10% higher than January figures. Dollar-denominated coins dominate unequivocally: Tether (USDT) is valued at $185 billion, and Circle (USDC) at $75 billion. Against this backdrop, the share of euro stablecoins is a mere $912 million, accounting for less than 0.3% of the dollar stablecoin market.

The leaders in the euro segment are: EURC from Circle ($430 million), EURCV from Societe Generale ($130 million), and EURI from Banking Circle S.A. ($55 million). Even the largest among them, EURC, ranks only 12th among all stablecoins and 86th in the overall crypto asset ranking. The daily trading volume of euro tokens is around $100 million, while dollar-denominated assets process over $70 billion. The difference is staggering.

Analysts at TRM Labs noted a surge in euro stablecoin activity in the first quarter of 2026 following the implementation of MiCA rules—in March, trading turnover exceeded $700 million. However, this growth proved short-lived and soon declined, never approaching the levels of dollar-denominated coins.

The MiCA Paradox: Regulation as a Brake

One might think the MiCA framework would give euro stablecoins a competitive edge: clear rules, consumer protection, and clarity for issuers. Yet in practice, the document has become a major obstacle. The key issue lies in reserve requirements. Issuers must hold at least 30% of reserves in deposits at local banks, and for major players, this threshold rises to 60%. This creates more burdensome conditions than the U.S. GENIUS Act, which allows flexible regulation of issuers at the state level.

European regulators, on the other hand, reject any attempts to ease the rules. In the spring, the Bruegel think tank proposed lowering liquidity requirements, but the European Central Bank (ECB) rejected the initiative. ECB President Christine Lagarde cited risks to the banking system, including threats to traditional lending and the difficulty of controlling interest rates. Instead of supporting stablecoins, the ECB is betting on tokenized bank deposits, which Lagarde believes combine the reliability of traditional accounts with blockchain speed.

The price of such caution is strategic lag. As ECB board member Isabel Schnabel stated, dollar dominance will strengthen not due to economic indicators but thanks to network effects and first-mover advantages. The digital euro, which could serve as an alternative, is not expected until at least the second half of 2027.

Market and Structural Barriers

Regulation is not the only reason. Crypto infrastructure has historically been built around the dollar: nearly all blockchain platforms are oriented toward USD pairs. This creates a recursive loop: high liquidity attracts users, who further increase liquidity. Euro tokens offer a limited number of trading pairs and minimal arbitrage opportunities, making a shift in trader interest unlikely.

Low demand from retail clients and banks is another factor. Europe lacks the "pain" driving the Turkish lira: a weak banking system, slow and expensive transfers. EU financial institutions provide cheap, round-the-clock instant payments through TARGET2 and TIPS systems, reducing the need for decentralized alternatives. Two-thirds of European banks cited insufficient demand for stablecoins.

Add to this the pressure on major players. Since July 1, crypto companies without a MiCA license must cease servicing EU clients. By May, only 194 out of 3,000 previously operating companies had obtained approval. Tether, the market leader, stopped issuing its euro stablecoin EURT back in 2024 and did not even apply for a license—the requirement to hold 60% of reserves in European banks is incompatible with its business model. Binance, Bybit, and OKX have already removed USDT trading pairs for European clients.

My Expert Perspective

The prospects for euro stablecoins look bleak. Without demand from banks and retail, and with active resistance from regulators, the market remains unattractive for issuers. Tokenization and CBDCs could provide a boost, but their implementation will take years. By then, dollar-denominated assets will have solidified their dominance, and Europe risks losing its position in the digital economy entirely. Euro stablecoins lost the battle before it even began—and this is not so much the result of market forces as it is of a deliberate choice by regulators.