Crypto news

International transfers are a real headache for businesses and individuals. Sending $200 abroad costs on average 6.4% of the amount, and through a bank—almost 15%. At the same time, the message itself reaches the recipient bank in ten minutes. A paradox? Not really. All the delay and the bulk of the costs arise after delivery—at the stage of compliance checks, reconciliations, and crediting, which can drag on for days.

Last Tuesday, August 4, the President of Russia signed the law "On Digital Currency and Digital Rights." This document marks a tectonic shift in the approach to regulation. Not only is Russia entering the game later than others, but it is also doing so in a unique way, creating not one but two parallel payment systems with different sets of rules.

The Essence of the Dispute: Not in Technology, but in Obligations

If we set aside the technical details, the key question is who bears responsibility for the funds at the moment of settlement. The central bank, a commercial bank, or a private issuing company? This determines who you go to with a claim if a payment gets "lost," and who benefits while the money is in transit. It is this "balance" that is the raw material of the banking economy: it is what they earn on, what they use for lending, and what they retain customers for.

Mikhail Kulakov, lead engineer-analyst of the "Blockchain" direction at DiSoft, rightly notes: the primary record and the right to modify it—that is what defines the model. The central bank's obligation lives on the regulator's platform, the bank's obligation lives in its accounting core, and the token issuer's obligation lives on a third-party network to which the bank has read-only access. Three answers yield three reconciliation models and three recovery scenarios in the event of a failure. The "last mile" is the time spent reconciling these records, not transmitting data.

What the Russian Law Brings

The new law comes into force on September 1, 2026. Mandatory registration of crypto exchanges in the Bank of Russia registry will begin on July 1, 2027, and part of the requirements for intermediaries—from September 2027. A new category of professional participants emerges—digital depositories. They will maintain records of clients' crypto assets, store key and backup IT infrastructure in Russia, and compensate for damages in the event of unauthorized write-offs.

Crypto exchanges are legalized, but with serious capital requirements—from 15 million rubles. Strict criteria are set for admitting assets to trading: market capitalization above 5 trillion rubles, average daily turnover exceeding 1 trillion, and a trading history of at least five years. Today, only bitcoin and ether meet these parameters. For non-qualified investors, a limit of 300 thousand rubles per year with a single intermediary and mandatory testing are introduced.

Domestic payments in cryptocurrency remain prohibited. However, not only custodial but also self-custody wallets are allowed. When withdrawing to an external address exceeding 100 thousand rubles, a 48-hour delay is provided, which will take effect on September 1, 2027.

The Central Bank's list itself does not prohibit owning assets outside it: the criteria relate to public offerings through Russian intermediaries, not to ownership rights. Digital currency is recognized as property with judicial protection. Foreign and non-custodial wallets are not prohibited; the owner is recognized as the one holding the access key.

Tax arises upon sale, not upon holding: 13% on income up to 2.4 million rubles and 15% above that, with a 3-NDFL declaration due by April 30. The holding-period exemption does not apply to digital currency. From July 1, 2027, banks are obliged to refuse transfers to unlicensed crypto services—the channel for funding foreign platforms through Russian banks is closing.

Two Circuits: Public and Private

Domestically, starting September 1, mandatory acceptance of the digital ruble begins—a state retail currency that the United States has legislatively rejected until the end of 2030 and that Europe is only designing so far. Externally, the circulation of private global assets is legalized. Both instruments are used simultaneously but are separated by purpose: domestically—only the public circuit, externally—only the private one.

The logic of the separation is simple if you look at the obligations. Domestically, the balance remains with the Bank of Russia: this provides traceability of settlements and independence from external infrastructure—but simultaneously raises the privacy question, which is why the retail model was rejected in the United States. Externally, an asset is used that no party to the transaction issues, which is why it works where correspondent channels have become difficult to navigate due to external restrictions in recent years. The sanctions context is not named in the law, but it is the most obvious explanation for the foreign economic activity norm: the issue is not the transfer fee, but the availability of the channel itself.

The pairing of public and private circuits is not unique—China, the UAE, and India do the same. The peculiarity of the Russian model lies in the strict segmentation by payment purpose, and it is shaped by external circumstances no less than by design.

Global Context and Practical Conclusion

The American framework took shape over a year. The GENIUS Act (July 2025) requires full backing of stablecoins with liquid assets and directly prohibits accruing income to token holders. And on July 11, 2026, the ban on a retail central bank digital currency became law. Europe chose the opposite instrument: the digital euro is being designed as a public alternative with zero yield and a holding limit, with a pilot planned for the second half of 2027 and the first issuance for 2029.

Mastercard closed the acquisition of BVNK on August 3, with the announced price at up to $1.8 billion, including about $300 million in contingent payments. The asset's value is largely regulatory: BVNK obtained a license under the MiCA regulation in Malta in February 2026, valid across the entire EU. In July, Visa launched a stablecoin issuance platform for banks.

The only one to report settlements with real money is the Bank for International Settlements project. On July 30, results were published: about thirty participants, including five central banks, 30 transactions in six currencies totaling around one million dollars, with an average settlement time of 80 seconds versus several business days in correspondent practice. The platform operated autonomously, without connection to existing systems and without real compliance procedures.

My conclusion: Russia is building not just two systems, but two different philosophies of money. Domestically—total traceability and control; externally—pragmatic work with global assets. The question for the next year and a half is not whether the circuits of different countries will align, but whether Russia will repeat the Chinese maneuver—accrue income or otherwise return the balance to banks. The answer will be visible in the dynamics of the deposit base by the end of 2027. For now, one thing is clear: the digital ruble will not become a voluntary instrument—it will become mandatory, and this will change the entire banking economy.