Crypto news

16.08.2026
08:02

Strategy for legally bypassing the Central Bank's 300,000 ruble limit: splitting transactions among intermediaries

The annual limit of 300,000 rubles on cryptocurrency purchases set by the Central Bank applies not cumulatively, but separately for each counterparty. This opens up a legal opportunity for an investor with significant capital to distribute transactions among several banks, brokers, and exchangers.

For most non-qualified investors, the established amount is quite sufficient. However, those planning investments above this threshold can use a mechanism that is not formally prohibited by the regulator: purchasing digital assets from several intermediaries at once. This approach does not violate the letter of the law, although it raises questions from the perspective of its spirit.

What the limit protects and why it benefits intermediaries

On the one hand, this format genuinely shields inexperienced market participants from excessive volatility—this is what the regulator declares. On the other hand, it gives intermediaries the necessary time to fine-tune direct work with cryptocurrencies and prepare infrastructure and qualified personnel.

There is also an indirect positive effect: the client's funds are distributed across different depositories, which reduces sanctions risks. For Bitcoin and Ethereum, a technical freeze at the blockchain level is not feasible, but risks of coin marking remain and cannot be ignored.

A separate issue is the lack of cross-platform data exchange. There is currently no unified system that would consolidate a client's operations across different intermediaries. Information is confidential and is transmitted to the regulator only in cases of suspicious activity. This creates grounds for abuse: a client can present identical documents on the origin of funds to the same intermediaries, and the intermediary itself is obliged to verify them.

Enforcement of the limit within a single organization falls on the company. Tracking the threshold is carried out through internal reporting and accounting systems—this process is fairly transparent for the regulator.

What cross-platform accounting will change

The introduction of tracking client activity by TIN in the future will give the regulator significantly more transparency. Likely, this will be followed by the introduction of a cumulative limit across all platforms at once. For now, no official system for such control exists in a desk-based manner.

Earlier, economist Mikhail Bryukhanov explained that distributing transactions among different licensed intermediaries remains a legal way to purchase cryptocurrency in amounts exceeding 300,000 rubles per year, since the restriction mechanism itself raises no objections to such operations.

In his assessment, this amount is quite sufficient for household expenses, but it would not be enough for a car or foreign real estate. Qualified investors are not affected by the new rules: the restrictions do not apply to those who meet educational and professional requirements or have passed special testing.

My view: the current structure of limits is a temporary measure designed to give the market time to adapt. Splitting transactions among intermediaries is a legal but risky path: as soon as cross-platform accounting by TIN appears, such schemes will lose relevance. Investors with significant capital should prepare in advance for stricter rules and consider strategies taking future changes into account.